 |
There should
be a world of difference in the
off-season training programs for young
athletes and established, older
professionals. However, it is common for
an enthusiastic youngster - - or the
over-enthusiastic parents - - to copy
what college or professional players are
doing. |
This is a
mistake, perhaps a permanent mistake if
too much time and energy are spent
unwisely. Some types of training are
appropriate at both ages, but if a given
program is the most appropriate one for
a 35 year-old superstar, it cannot be
the best program for an adolescent (or
younger) athlete.
Two concepts
must be understood to see why an aging
athlete should train differently than
younger players: (1) supercompensation,
and (2) age-dependent development of
athleticism.
The second
topic will be discussed next week, and
it is perhaps the most important, yet
poorly taught principal in team sports.
Coaches of individual sports are decades
ahead in this area, but in team sports,
nothing limits the development of
athletes more than the ignorance of
age-dependent training.
Supercompensation refers to the ability
of our bodies to adapt to, and
eventually overcompensate for the stress
of exercise. This is similar to
adaptations the body makes to other
types of stress, such as living at high
altitude, acclimatization to heat or
cold, and immunities built up after
contacting certain diseases.
Immunization
therapy is a great example. A
vaccination is simply the injection of a
small amount of a disease antigen, which
is detected by our body as a 'foreign'
invader. Our cells develop
antibodies to destroy these 'foreign'
antigens and prevent them from
proliferating in the future when we are
exposed to an epidemic spread of the
particular disease for which we were
vaccinated.
Why is this
topic so important for young athletes?
Because supercompensation is the only
reason for a young athlete to train -
the goal is to get better. An
older, established professional simply
wants to maintain the status quo for a
few more years - - and a few million
dollars.
We know that
muscles not only adapt to a consistent
heavy stress, but actually
overcompensate by becoming bigger and
stronger. A weight that causes
failure in the initial days of training
will be much easier to lift after a few
weeks. This is supercompensation.
If the
exercise stress is a daily endurance
run, the supercompensation takes several
forms, not so visible to the naked eye.
Strengthening of the heart muscle,
enables it to pump a larger volume of
blood with each beat, so it doesn't have
to work as fast at a given load.
Local changes in skeletal muscles are
microscopic in size, but the results are
huge, allowing the endurance-trained
athlete to deliver more energy and
oxygen to muscles and use them
efficiently for longer periods of time.
Supercompensation requires two factors:
(1) the stimulus, which is an adequate
stress from exercise, and (2) the
rebuilding process, which requires
adequate rest and nutrition.
Rebuilding
comes only when rest and nutritional
plans are built into the overall plan.
Muscles will only become bigger and
stronger if there is a good diet.
This includes fruits, vegetables, grains
from cereal and bread, dairy products,
lean meat, and some fat. For an
athlete undergoing intense training,
there must be protein in several meals
per day, especially after the workout.
Dairy
products, eggs, and meat contain the
highest quality protein, because they
provide all the essential amino acids.
However, by intentionally eating more of
these products, you must make a
concerted effort to eliminate some of
the saturated (animal) fats.
Therefore, low-fat varieties are the
healthiest.
How much
protein is necessary?
An athlete in
training should consume up to a gram of
protein per day for every pound of body
weight, twice the amount recommended for
a sedentary person. This can
easily be achieved with an intelligent,
well-balanced diet. Consuming much
more protein than this might be harmful,
so supplements should be used wisely.
This is not a case where mega doses are
better than the recommended amount.
Rest/Recovery
is just as important as intense
workouts.
While no one
doubts the importance of a good diet in
athletic development, many high school
athletes pay little attention.
This is an opportunity lost.
However,
almost no one plans their rest/recovery
as well as they plan the workouts.
This limits the amount of
supercompensation just as surely as
failing to work out. Recovery must
follow every intense workout to allow
muscles and other organ-systems to
rebuild even stronger. It also
allows the next workout to be more
intense after a good rest period.
Also, during
any workout, careful planning should
dictate the length of the rest intervals
between sets of sprints, jumps, or
strength exercises. Again, this
allows each subsequent set to have
enough quality or intensity to serve as
an adequate stimulus for improvement.
Consider the
attributes of athleticism and skill that
need to be developed in a young hockey
player: skills like skating, shooting,
stickhandling plus athletic attributes
like speed, quickness, agility,
coordination, explosive power, strength,
balance, etc. Each of these can only be
developed through quality repetitions.
In other
words, a sluggish workout will do more
harm than good in any of these areas - -
like a golfer going on the range and
hitting hundreds of balls without
quality. On the other hand, if
aerobic endurance is the only objective
of a workout - - perhaps for a middle
aged non-athlete - -there are benefits
even if intensity and quality are
lacking. The sluggish workout
would still challenge the cardiovascular
system, reduce body fat, and increase
resistance to middle-age diabetes, among
a host of further benefits.
But if an
athlete goes on the ice to improve skill
- - and if quality is missing in the
repetitions, the results are
counterproductive. This is also
true for dryland workouts for speed,
explosiveness, or any of the qualities
needed to improve as a hockey player.
Supercompensation requires planning for
recovery and commitment to intensity
during the workouts. If
either ingredient is missing there will
be no improvement.